The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites providing both totally free casino-style games and rewarding rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to mention claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of illegal sports betting in a New York suit that declares VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions between conventional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social networks

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads typically center around the social element of the casinos, while omitting the capacity for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, planes and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never provided up.'

The inconsistency in between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social gambling establishments use consumers a possibility to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to unlock various functions within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting clients to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's cars, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are prohibited in all but 7 states, which has actually helped to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need normally need identification. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in ask for free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, thereby providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a method of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to pay for a chance to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference in between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting sites like casinos.'

Think of the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that offer them the chance to win profitable prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not satisfy the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of daily businesses in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of sports betting industry insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're normally not connected to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the qualities typically associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the common payout percentage for a short-lived marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income made by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, using consumers the chance to play casino-style games for real rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually considering that been shuttered over claims of prohibited sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst several celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face similar scrutiny.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been pointed out by courts and state lawyer generals as key consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for prohibited sports betting.'

One of the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up substantial tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming changes that performed through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent claim, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal gambling business. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as offenders in suits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company responded to DailyMail.com's request for remark.

'We usually do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games across the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, creating not only fantastic games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to intensely protect any claim which might be brought against us.'

The problems in between conventional online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos could show bothersome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues wish to predict a strong position versus illegal gaming - especially when trying to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over allegations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently unlawful sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have an obligation to explain to clients the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our values are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton